Great
one...I found
this on an anti-drugs site, and I don't entirely get why the
fact that the brain has THC receptors is a bad thing. In fact, those
"this is your brain on
drugs" posters are usually complete bullshit alltogether. Whilst it's true
things like heroin and cocaine do cause neurological damage, as do most
amphetamine based drugs (which are actually regularly given to USAF pilots, in a
wonderful display of hipocrisy), cannabis and most other illegal drugs don't
cause any known brain damage whatsoever. Apart from the inherent risks of
smoking, the only real problem with it is that it can trigger some latent
psychoses earlier than normal (such as schizophrenia) but only in people who
were going to get them later in life anyway.
To be honest, most drugs
propaganda and "education" has little to no basis in reality*. Of course, this
doesn't stop governments trying to push this idea that drugs are somehow
immoral, and for the most part it's worked. Alcohol, of course, is socially fine
(despite the fact that a night of heavy drinking destroys thousands of
braincells and often ends in violence, whereas a night of smoking cannabis
destroys no braincells and usually ends in eating a bowl of cereal and
forgetting where you put your phone, but you could swear it was ringing earler)
as is being addicted to medical drugs. Caffeine, too, is socially fine, despite
killing a few people every year. It appears that the establishment in general
has some desire to prevent people actually enjoying things.
Here's a
couple of interesting statements on the
DEA teen-brainwashing site:"Research has now established
that marijuana is addictive."
"Marijuana" can be addictive, it's true. Then
again, so can masturbation, drinking orange juice and exercise (only one of the
four of these do I think should be banned. Guess which one). That's a fact. What
the DEA fails to mention is that it's only
mentally addictive. Anything
that one enjoys can become addictive thanks to the brain's pleasure-seeking
nature. Cannabis is in no way physically addictive, and neither is LSD.
Caffeine, alcohol and nicotine all are, with caffeine being more addictive than
heroin** (gram-for-gram).
"The brain. Smoking marijuana leads to some
changes in the brain similar to those caused by cocaine, heroin and
alcohol."
This is another delightful misrepresentation. What they fail to
mention is that all
independent research shows that other than in
very heavy users, cannabis has no lasting neurological
effects.
"Marijuana contains the same cancer-causing chemicals as
tobacco."
Actually, no it doesn't. Tobacco is grown commercially and some of
the chemicals sprayed on it cause tobacco to contain Lead-210 and Polonium-210,
both radioactive carcinogens, which are two of the major causes of lung cancer.
Even if it did have the same health properties as tobacco, cannabis users
typically smoke much less cannabis than the typical smoker would smoke tobacco
(although cannabis users do tend to hold the smoke in longer).
"For young
users, marijuana can lead to increased anxiety, panic attacks, depression and
other mental health problems."
Cannabis, as I've already stated, doesn't
actually cause any mental health problems (to the best of our knowledge),
although it can trigger latent conditions. It's actually used by many sufferers
of depression, schizophrenia and other illnesses to help regulate
symptoms.
"Research has shown a link between frequent marijuana use and
increased violent behavior."
Even if this were true (which it isn't), the
only reason for any link between cannabis and violence is due to its
illegality.
"The substances in marijuana stay in the fatty parts of the
body for long periods of time."
True, true. This is, however, a scare tactic-
it's the breakdown products of the cannibinoids, which are harmless and have no
effect whatsoever on the body, which can stay in the bodyfats, and only stay for
a month at most (in
very heavy users).
I could do this all night,
but I have other things to do. Haven't had a coffee in ages. So
cold...
*An excellent example of this is the DEA's "Drugs cause
terrorism" campaign. The delightful irony is that it's actually the fact that
drugs are illegal that means terrorist organisations are able to profit from
their sale
**This is completely true, but people tend to take less caffeine
than heroin. I am, of course, not anti-caffeine, I just think the choice of
whether or not to take a drug should be left to the individual.